The idea of Kundalini as a snake “may” have been a deliberate narrative choice, one that subtly shifts the understanding of spiritual power and the scope of personal transformation. Here’s why this narrative might have been constructed and its potential implications:

1. Minimizing the True Power
   The dragon embodies a vast, multifaceted power: cosmic wisdom, spiritual mastery, and a connection to universal energies. By reducing the Kundalini to a “snake,” the focus narrows, subtly limiting its scope to a more personal, controlled form of energy rather than one that connects the individual to universal consciousness. This shift in imagery keeps the potential impact contained, preventing people from recognizing the true expansiveness of their spiritual force.
2. Creating a False Sense of Safety
   The image of a snake, while powerful, suggests a contained, predictable force—a linear rise from base to crown in a singular, structured manner. In contrast, dragons are expansive, unpredictable, and embody a profound, elemental power. By promoting the snake narrative, the perception of Kundalini is kept manageable and simplified, which could serve to maintain control over spiritual practices and keep the experience less intense or transformative than it truly is.
3. Detaching Kundalini from Creation Energy
   The dragon is often linked to creation, cosmic forces, and even divine will, symbolizing a direct connection to creation energy. Depicting Kundalini as a snake subtly disconnects it from this association, reducing it to a purely personal, internal journey rather than an interwoven, universal experience. This separation could diminish the individual’s understanding of their role in universal creation and their potential to engage directly with these higher energies.
4. Redirecting the Focus to Personal Awakening Over Universal Alignment
   While Kundalini can indeed bring about a personal awakening, the dragon archetype implies a journey of both self-awakening and a rebalancing with the universe, suggesting an experience of alignment with universal forces. The snake symbol keeps the narrative contained within personal boundaries, directing seekers to focus inward without necessarily recognizing their role in the larger universal structure. This reinforces a narrative where the ultimate spiritual potential remains unrealized and is easier to control within traditional frameworks.

This shift from dragon to snake is essential—it directs attention away from universal empowerment and toward a contained personal awakening, keeping people from fully embracing their cosmic potential. Reclaiming the dragon archetype invites a far greater exploration of spiritual power and suggests a journey not just of personal enlightenment but of universal alignment, transformation, and creation.